Further Confirmation that Voter Fraud Exists and that the Presidential Election Was "Stolen" by the Democrats

Two news items further support the contention that voter frauds exists that would allow one to assume that the Democrats "stole" the 2020 Presidential election. In the first story: Gavin Newsom recall petition succeeds in California.

The significance of the first story is that when those in power want to "validate" an election, in this case the recall petition that they oppose, they will go to extremes to verify the signatures submitted (ballots) in the hope of the petition failing. According to the article: "California Secretary of State Shirley Weber announced that 1.6 million of the 2.1 million signatures submitted to recall the Democrat Newsom have been certified as valid, exceeding the threshold of 1.49 million required to trigger a special election." That means that 23.8% of the signatures were determined to be "invalid". By extension, one has to seriously question the validity of any election results where the validity of the person submitting the ballot was not verified.

In a second story OAN reports: Arizona Audit Underway.  In this second story, it is noted that the Democrats are seeking too: "Democrat Party officials have tried to challenge the audit in court and they are deploying their operatives in the mainstream media in an attempt downplay the severity of election fraud as well as discredit Republican challenges to election security." So here we have Democrats (unlike in California) seeking to prevent the auditing (verification) of a petition (election result) because they supposedly "won".

The connection of Arizona to the California recall petition is that when the Democratic establishment wants to protect itself (when in power), it unsurprisingly wants the election results to be verified. But when the Democrats "beat" the Republicans in Arizona (and other states) it does not want the election results to be verified through an audit. The obvious implication, the Democrats must be hiding something, in terms of the 2020 Presidential election. Election fraud apparently exists leading to the Democrats "stealing" the 2020 Presidential election.

Biden and the Democrats "Win" the 2020 Election with the "BIG LIE" II

Evidence that Biden "stole" the 2020 Presidential election continues to grow.  Today, the narrative that Russians had placed bounties on US troops in Afghanistan has begun to unravel. According to Townhall: "Now the liberal Daily Beast website is offering a jaw-dropping assessment: "It was a huge election-time story that prompted cries of treason. But according to a newly disclosed assessment, Donald Trump might have been right to call it a 'hoax.'"

During the Presidential election, the Biden campaign and the complicit media incessantly broadcast that lie to the American people and demanded that the traitor Trump "do something" to respond to this vile Russian threat. How many voters may have been swayed to vote for Biden based on those lies is unknown. What is significant is that Biden (now that he has assumed the Presidency) and the complicit US intelligence community have now conveniently retracting that claim as being "unverified".

The Russian bounties story was apparently fake news all along

Surprise! The ‘Russian Bounty’ Story Hyped Up By Corrupt Media To Hurt Trump Turned Out To Be Fake News 

The Russian Bounty Story Erodes

This is one of those questionable stories amplified by the left wing media to desperately undermine Trump to prevent him from winning the Presidential election. One of many "nails" that was used by the left to manipulate the election process in favor of Biden. Now that Biden is President, the story has to be "disappeared" so that Biden won't have to respond or otherwise suffer political fallout from failing to address the fake bounties that the Biden campaign accused Trump of ignoring. Unfortunately, none of those who spread the Russian bounty lies will ever retract them and/or apologize. To bad the election can't be redone.

Other small stories that incrementally point to how the Biden campaign "stole" the election. 

Voter "Fraud" Exists

Yes, the Democrats "Stole" the 2020 Election

Biden and the Democrats "Win" the 2020 Election with the "BIG LIE"

Voter "Fraud" Exists

In my prior post I wrote: Yes, the Democrats "Stole" the 2020 Election. Since then some an interesting statistic has emerged that would give credence to the belief that elections results can't really be trusted without voter integrity protections. So was Biden legitimately elected?

The effort to recall Governor Newsom is underway in California and can serve as a discussion point concerning the legitimacy of Biden's claim "win". That recall effort requires that people sign a petition, or for the sake of this post a "ballot". The California Secretary of State just released a document (Cumulative Statewide Summary as of 03/11/21) that shows that 18.33% of the signatures are invalid, or to use another politically charged word: "fraudulent". (As an aside, Democrats have forwarded HR-1 to the Senate to remove voter integrity requirements. Additionally, signature verification for a Newsom recall (state level) is considered appropriate but was not for a Presidential election (national level).)

Given that 18.33% of the signatures have been determined to be invalid, by extension one can project that this error rate could also apply to a normal election and to other states. The Democrats have been extremely aggressive in demanding that signature verification requirements be eliminated. That creates an opportunity for fraud. If 18.33% of the voters can't be verified as legitimate, can an election be considered valid, especially if it is close? From memory, voter integrity was a major concern with the elections in Georgia and Pennsylvania. Or in any state were unsolicited mail-in ballots were mass-mailed to every address. When 18.33% of the vote (in one state) can't be verified and the Democrats obstruct verification, Biden's supposed "win" is very suspect.

Yes, the Democrats "Stole" the 2020 Election

The Democrats have contended that that stories promulgated by Republicans that there was election fraud which resulted in the Republicans losing the 2020 election were bogus. Well, it seems that the Republicans have a case for claiming that the Democrats, through their allies the liberal news media and big tech, did commit election "fraud". Maybe not in the usual overt-way that fraud is usually perceived.

The Washington Post just "corrected" a story that they published in early January 2021 that (falsely) asserted that Trump made nasty and threatening remarks towards Georgia election officials.  This false story could have cost the Republican senators their reelection bid and given the election to Democrats.  Additionally, it lead to the unjustified Kangaroo Court impeachment of Trump by the Democrats.

Joe Concha slams WaPo error: Another misleading story 'gobbled up' by anti-Trump media 

Greg Gutfeld blasts WaPo's 'deep-fake news' after massive retraction in Trump-Georgia reporting

Joe Concha notes that these false "hand-grenade" stories, just before an election can have devastating impacts. But that the eventual retraction, after the fact, is essentially meaningless since the desired negative damage has already been inflicted. The Republicans lost and there is no recourse. Joe Concha starting at approximately the 1:50 minute mark, observes how the two Republican senators running for reelection in Georgia may have lost the Georgia election because of the anti-Trump media's incessant lying concerning Trump. The two Republican senators lost their re-election bid, which has given the Democrats control of the US Senate. Now that the truth is emerging, it is too late to fix this through an election do-over.

Other false stories successfully pushed by the Democrats, the anti-Trump media, and big-tech included assertions that Trump was doing nothing to combat Covid-19 despite the fact that his administration initiated the process for developing several Covid-19 vaccines and implementing the vaccines distribution process. (One of Biden's numerous lies in his Covid-19 speech (march 12, 2021) was that it was his administration implementing vaccine distribution.) The suppression of the Hunter Biden scandal: Hunter Biden Alleged Corruption Publicly Revealed - Disclosure Suppressed. The take-down of Parler under the false premises of "false information" and "hate speech" to suppress conservative free-speech. Game Stop, Robinhood, Reddit, and Fake News. 

Particularly troubling with the Parler take-down was that it was an "attack" in an instantaneous and coordinated effort by a "gang" of tech companies to keep Parler off the internet. It would seem that if a cabal of companies collude to prevent one company from doing something that that raises conspiracy concerns, one of them being anti-trust. Another, that they were conducting an underhanded gorilla war operation against the Trump campaign to "steal" the election.

Currently, a hot topic, Biden has opened the border to unimpeded illegal immigration. Children are being put in "cages". Biden's Neanderthal Thinking Enabling Child Abuse at the US Southern Border. Yet the media successfully painted Trump as being inhumane for his immigration policies. So far those media outlets condemning Trump's immigration policies have not been silent on Biden's abuse of children.

Two side stories to add. One is a video by Mike Lindell: Absolute Proof, and the other by Peter Navarro: Navarro Report. Both offer some tantalizing evidence of traditional fraud. Unfortunately, it seems that the anti-Trump crowd had sufficient legal clout to squash any investigation into whether any traditional fraud (actual manipulation of the voting results) had actually occurred. 

Laura Ingraham had an interesting analysis supporting election manipulation based on a Time Magazine story: Ingraham: Big Tech, Big Business and BLM exposed as 'unholy trinity' behind Biden win.

Of course, no one story by itself can be designated as proof of election "fraud", but one can see that if each individual story is added to the fraud tally that there was "fraud" in the sense that the gullible public was manipulated into believing a false narrative thereby electing Biden.

Biden's Neanderthal Thinking Enabling Child Abuse at the US Southern Border

This past week a couple of horrific stories emerged pointing to Biden's incompetence that require a degree of follow-up.  In the first instance, as a result of Biden "Opening the Border" to illegal immigration, there has been a massive increase in the number of unaccompanied children being allowed to enter the US. Existing facilities have proven to be inadequate, thereby requiring that "catch and release" to be re-implemented.  This eventually means that those released into the US will "disappear" into the general population. The border is open. 

As a final note to the open border, some of the illegal immigrants have tested positive for Covid-19. Apparently, there is no real effort by the Biden administration to address this "super spreader event" despite the imposition of lock-downs and mask mandates for regular US citizens.  A double standard. See the "Neanderthal Thinking" write-up further below.

Getting back to the issue of the facilities that would temporarily hold the illegal unaccompanied minors, the Democrats went berserk with endless horrid accusations that the Trump administration was "ripping" the children from their parents and inhumanely putting the children into "cages". The Biden administration is once again implementing that strategy, originally initiated by the Obama administration; but now calling the policy humane for welcoming them into the US.

Going beyond the issue of "cages" is an issue few seem to be looking at. The parents are "abandoning" their children and sending them on a long lonely hazardous journey without parental supervision in many cases to enter the US. That is child abuse. By opening border, Biden has indirectly encourage parents to force their kids to take a long hazardous journey.  Some even die along the way. When that type of death occurred under the Trump administration, Trump was essentially called a "baby killer". If the actions of the Trump administration were deemed heartless, then Biden should be held to the same standard. Given that, Biden is enabling "child abuse" through his open border policies.

Given the Democrats new low bar for impeachment, Biden should be impeached for enabling "child abuse". The parents of every unaccompanied minor should be arrested for child abuse, when subject to US jurisdiction, for putting their children in danger. 

The segue to "Neanderthal Thinking". Biden recently slammed the Governor of Texas, Greg Abbott, for lifting the statewide mask mandate calling it a “big mistake” and using the pejorative racist language of “Neanderthal thinking.” Biden's outrageous accusations are wrong on several levels. Just because the
Neanderthals aren't around anymore does not mean that they should be demeaned. On what basis can Biden assert that Neanderthals are stupid? Biden even said to a Black man, "that if you don't vote for me, you aren't Black enough".  The Democrats are exceptionally aggressive about calling out people when they make statements that the Democrats can misconstrue as being racist statements. Given that, Biden was making a racist derogatory statement.

Biden is claiming it is somehow unsafe for Abbott for cancel the face mask mandate. Yet Biden is opening the border and letting illegal immigrants flood the US without any apparent Covid-19 restrictions. That creates a Covid-19 super spreader event. Seems that Biden is unaware of his inconsistencies.

Biden - The US Border is Open

Of course, the Democrats will never publicly admit that. They will sanctimoniously claim they are for border security. They aren't. 

This post is a follow-up to my prior post: Illegal Immigration Allowed into the US by the Biden Administration. On February 18, 2021 the New York Times printed this story: The Democrats’ immigration proposal offers an eight-year path to citizenship. The significance of this story is in what was said and what was not said. The overarching theme of the story is that those in the US illegally, instead of being deported, will be allowed to stay and given a path to citizenship. That makes a mockery of any claims that the Biden administration will provide enhanced border security.  The Washington Times writes: "President Biden‘s immigration bill cancels penalties for future illegal immigrants, speeds legalization of those already here and increases legal immigration levels."  In my prior post, I had reviewed how the border security efforts of the Trump administration were being dismantled.  The New York Times wrote:

Unlike previous efforts to overhaul immigration, the legislation does not include a large focus on increased border enforcement. Instead, the bill adds resources to process migrants legally at ports of entry and invests $4 billion over four years in distressed economies in the hopes of preventing people from fleeing to the United States because of security and economic crises.

But the bill tries to make the most far-reaching changes in immigration law in more than three decades. It would sweep away restrictions on family-based immigration, making it easier for spouses and children to join their families already in the country. And it would expand worker visas to allow more foreigners to come to the United States for jobs.

As with all legislation the details are hidden in the "fine print" and in the absence of certain themes. While the "fine print" is not yet available, the implications are clear with the headline's theme of offering illegal immigrants a path to citizenship.  That is an "open" incentive to migrate to the US. Especially in the absence of any negative incentives for entering the US illegally.

The absent theme is "deportation" of those illegally here. There is a vague nod to "preventing people" from entering the US. But that is not further discussed as the emphasis is on legitimizing those who are here now and loosing restrictions for those who may enter the country, in the future, illegally. The Washington Times wrote: "The Biden plan checks off most of the major wish-list items of immigrant-rights activists, including: funding lawyers for some migrants who want to challenge their deportations; granting speedy legal status to “Dreamers” and farm workers; pouring cash into Latin America for nation-building activities; and slashing barriers to legal immigration."

The operative theme of the proposed legislation is legitimizing those illegal immigrants who are here. Not deporting them. In fact, the proposed immigration plan, would allow illegal immigrants (once legitimized) to bring into the US family members from their native country. No need to illegally cross the border. The net effect, the border is open. 

------------------------------------------------

Update 2/19/2021: Since posting Biden has "opened" the border for some individuals waiting in Mexico. US begins admitting migrants from Mexico, as Biden administration winds down Trump-era policy.  Biden is quickly "opening" the border but has yet to issue any actions to make the "border secure" to prevent illegal immigration. Biden's apparent silence on any "secure border" initiatives means that he has no intention of actually controlling illegal immigration. Biden has given illegal immigrants the "green light". The border is open. 

------------------------------------------------

Update 4/08/2021: Since posting this cartoon was published.

 

Illegal Immigration Allowed into the US by the Biden Administration

Two articles concerning illegal immigration caught my attention today. In the first article: Jen Psaki Claims ‘Border Is Not Open,’ Admits Biden’s DHS Is Releasing Migrants into U.S.  That obviously raises the question, if the border is not open, why are the illegal immigrants being released into the US? In the second article: DHS will admit 25,000 migrants waiting in Mexico. 

 Consider these parallel factors:

• One of Biden's first Executive Orders upon assuming the Presidency was to "ban" deportations (ostensibly for 100 days). That means that once in the US, the illegal immigrants won't, for the time being, be deported. That allows the illegal immigrants to essentially disappear into the general population of the US. Never to be found. The Biden administration is required to protect the border from unauthorized entry, yet the Biden administration is effectively circumventing this rule-of-law.
• White House considering domestic travel bans to stop coronavirus mutations surge. Nevertheless, it appears that illegal immigrants are being allowed to enter the US without Covid-19 testing. That means that Biden is creating a Covid-19 disease vector (super spreader event) to enter the US, yet Biden claims that draconian efforts are needed to stop the spread of Covid-19. Biden is not following "the science" as he lamely professes. Total cognitive dissonance.
  
• Democrats have maintained that it would be inhumane to deport illegal immigrants after they have been in the US for a period of time. Especially if they had entered the US as children. That sets the stage for assertions that any attempt to deport someone, especially if it is a family unit, is somehow inhumane. What that means, once in the US, the illegal immigrants can't be deported.
• ICE reveal: 1.2 million illegal immigrants awaiting deportation.  According to the article: "ICE is currently monitoring nearly 1.2 million illegal immigrants who’ve been ordered deported but have not yet left the U.S. — and nearly all of them are still free in the community, the agency told a federal court this week, revealing the monumental task of policing them all. .. Mr. Berg said of the tens of thousands of people who have been given a final order of removal over the last two years, less than 18% have actually been deported." One can easily conclude that the judicial system is structured in such a manner that it is almost impossible to deport someone. Of course, this will be exacerbated by the Biden administration since they endorse illegal immigration, which will further suppress the ability to deport.
• Democrats have maintained that it would be logistically impossible to deport all the illegal immigrants, yet they do nothing to stop the illegal immigration. Unbelievably, the Biden administration is dismantling the programs to slow illegal immigration instituted by the Trump administration. Not only that, but DHS will admit 25,000 migrants waiting in Mexico. So not only is the Biden administration dismantling efforts to block illegal immigration, they are actually promoting it by actively bringing illegal immigrants into the US. 
  

Despite the Biden's administration deceptive word-salad, the border is open to illegal immigration.

Game Stop, Robinhood, Reddit, and Fake News

On January 27, 2020, Game Stop was caught in a classic short sellers squeeze which forced the stock price of Game Stop to soar and the market to "crash" as short sellers covered their positions. I'm not going to go into any of the details concerning this. Its very complex. What I will touch on, is the reaction of a financial pundit. In exacerbation he sarcastically remarked (paraphrased): "Where where the fact checkers"!!!

The financial pundits reaction was monumental. First, in publicly recognizing that the social media platforms can be utilized for market manipulation. Second, that a person who would normally be considered "outside" the world of hypercritical political hysteria would actually reference the atrocious use of "fact checkers" by social media platforms to suppress conservative thought, even to the point of de-platforming Parler.

The financial pundit's remark was sarcastic. I speculate that it was an extension of social media platforms use of questionable "fact checkers" repressing conservative speech under the claimed auspices preventing, as some examples: "fake news" and "misinformation".  "Fake news" and "misinformation" are the "bread and butter" of those participating in stock market manipulation. In conclusion, the financial pundit was highlighting the absurdity of social media platforms using "fact checkers" to suppress conservative thought, but then allowing stock market manipulation to occur through the use of their platforms without "fact checking" content control supervision. A double standard.

Rand Paul Highlights the Deceit of the Democrats Appaling Impeachment Efforts

The You Tube video that was originally posted here has since become "unavailable" whatever that means. As a substitute, I'm posting this: 

 

WATCH: Rand Paul Highlights Democrat ‘Incitement’ in Speech Against Impeachment Trial

The Corruption of Civil Rights

Civil Rights as a concept has been corrupted. Originally Civil Rights was about achieving "equality". Martin Luther King, in his "I Have a Dream Speech" proclaimed: "I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character." (emphasis added).  Today, "equality" is not the objective anymore for achieving Civil Rights. Instead, the objective is now to use race (the color of their skin) under the concept of "equity". King would be very disappointed.

Biden through his inaugural address and his recent Executive Orders has essentially legitimized this race based "equity" approach and made it official government policy.

Video:  Gutfeld on President Biden pushing racial equity over equality

Since originally posting, Bob Woodson published this opinion article:  The Civil Rights Movement I was a part of has been betrayed by a twisted progressive ideology

Biden and the Democrats "Win" the 2020 Election with the "BIG LIE"

Biden has now assumed the office of the President of the US. Biden's "Big Lie" concerning Covid-19 is now beginning to unravel. Unfortunately, this is occurring after the election is over. The Democrats get the "trophy" of the Presidency and Legislative control through unethical and dishonest practices, despite their lies of sanctimoniously supporting those values to the public.

In a moment of post inauguration breaking news: Biden says pandemic's 'trajectory' can't be changed in coming several months​. From the article: "President Biden said that there is little that can be done to affect the course of the coronavirus pandemic in the coming days." Essentially, Biden who claimed to have a plan and (superhuman) leadership capabilities to end the Corona-19 virus pandemic before the election, now; after assuming office unbelievably says there is nothing that can be done. The "Big Lie" that successfully swayed the gullible public to vote for Biden and the Democrats.

Biden, throughout his campaign (falsely) claimed, that the Trump administration was doing nothing to combat the Covid-19 pandemic despite the very real existence of project warp speed. Furthermore, Biden during the campaign asserted that all the Covid-19 deaths in the US could be attributed directly to Trumps "failures", blatantly ignoring that other world leaders also had various success rates and death rates. Biden made accusations (easy to do), but then failed to say (hard to do) what could have been done differently. Now, Biden after saying that he had a plan and leadership skills is essentially saying that "nothing would have made a difference". All that dramatic hysterical criticism of Trump was for pure political theater to manipulate an election. Very unethical. 

In a typical twisted disingenuous attempt to cover-up this gaffe,  ABC news reported: Biden's early approach to virus: Underpromise, overdeliver. Particularly galling: "Chris Lu, a longtime Obama administration official, said the grim tone is aimed at “restoring trust in government” that eroded during the Trump administration." It was the Biden campaign that was undermining trust in government by claiming that Trump was doing nothing. Now that Biden has assumed office, the Biden administration acts as if none of their pre-election promises were ever made and now proclaims that they can do nothing to alter the natural progress of the pandemic. The Biden campaign mislead the public.

The Democrats during the 2020 election cycle were adamant concerning the use of "lock downs" as one strategy to blunt the spread of Covid-19. Evidently this strategy, because it is ineffective, is now falling apart after a year for a variety of reasons. One, the lack of science supporting it and second, the adverse impacts that it has had on the nations economy and people's lives. This points to Biden's previous assertions endorsing a "lock down" strategy as being fundamentally flawed in retrospect. At the time the "lock down" was initially introduced, it seemed reasonable. But over time and with evolving science, the "lock down" strategy began to display its ineffectiveness. Rather than adapt, Democrats increasingly weaponize this strategy to sabotage Trumps re-election efforts.  For Democrats its always party above the national interest.

The Democrats "won" by deploying the "Big Lie" and through the support of a complicit media that never challenged Biden's false assertions. Unfortunately, election can't be redone.

NPR Part of the Anti-Trump Deep State

Recently the New York Post reported: Emails reveal how Hunter Biden tried to cash in big on behalf of family with Chinese firm. Media reaction was swift to suppress this story. Even NPR responded that the story was not "worth their time". A somewhat arrogant and closed minded attitude by a supposed news organization. NPR slammed for dismissing coverage of Hunter Biden laptop scandal as a 'waste of time'. 

Now a Mr. Bobulinsk has come forward with facts, emails, and dates that may implicate Biden, the Democratic candidate for President, as being corrupt. One would think that a news organization would be interested in investigating these allegations. After all do you really want a corrupt person as President?

NPR's dismissal of this story is actually quite troubling. Back in September 2019 they were all in for investigating the unsubstantiated allegations of Christine Blasey Ford against Brett Kavanaugh. Reporters Dig Into Justice Kavanaugh's Past, Allegations Of Misconduct Against Him. 

Ms. Ford in her unsubstantiated allegations was vague concerning details, such as time and place. Furthermore, the alleged incident, if it did occur, was around 35 years ago.  Conversely, today, through Mr. Bubulinsk as one source, concrete current detailed information implying that Biden is corrupt is being released. Given the implications, every media outlet should be digging deep into the story. Incomprehensibly, according to NPR, we are to somehow believe that this story is not "worth investigating"?!?!?!

Another Confirmation that the Presidential Debates Were Blatantly Anti-Trump

I watched the Presidential debate last night between Trump and Biden. The debates are supposed to inform the viewer of what the candidates stand for so that the viewer can make an informed decision on who they will vote for. 

So even though, I watched the debate, it turns out that I missed a lot. Sometimes it takes a bit of time before partisan points surface that demonstrate that last night's debate once again proved to be another blatant anti-Trump forum. 

 On Tucker Carlson Tonight, Tucker played a video clip where the moderator (Kristen Welker) pointed out that Trump had made a derogatory comment concerning Dr. Fauci and asked Trump to explain. Fair enough. 

It turns out that both Biden and Harris had also made derogatory remarks concerning Dr. Fauci in the past that I was unaware of. Tucker showed these illustrative video clips. How come the moderator never pointed out to Biden his derogatory remarks concerning Dr. Fauci and asked him to explain? 

The video clips Tucker showed, since they spanned several months, had Dr. Fauci making inconsistent statements: like wear a mask, don't wear a mask. I don't have a problem with those types of inconsistent statements since how we approach the virus changes over time as we learn more. What I do have a problem with, is that Biden has insincerely claimed to strictly follow "the science" and used that "hammer" to vilify Trump, by saying that Trump has not been following "the science" and is therefore unfit to be re-elected. Seems that it is Biden, by misusing facts who is unfit to be elected.

Hunter Biden Alleged Corruption Publicly Revealed - Disclosure Suppressed

Yesterday, the news broke concerning Hunter Biden's alleged corruption.  'Use your influence': Hunter Biden report undercuts father, upends campaign.  New York Post Article: Emails reveal how Hunter Biden tried to cash in big on behalf of family with Chinese firm.

Of further interest:

• Social Media has censored this story for general distribution.
• According to Fox News none of the other media stations (CNN not mentioned) carried the story.
• Twitter locks press secretary Kayleigh McEnany's account.
• New York Post locked out of Twitter after publishing Biden bombshell

Quite amazing how quickly social media outlets immediately suppressed this story so that the public would not be aware of this alleged corruption.

Just five days ago, I speculated that there may be some unknown reason for why the Presidential debate was cancelled for tonight. It is possible that the Biden campaign, to a degree, was aware of this story brewing. Of course, direct concrete facts of why the debate was cancelled will not be publicly available.

As has already been noted by Fox News, it will be interesting to observe if Biden, at tonight's town hall meeting, will actually be asked to comment on this breaking story.

Tossing Neutrality Aside, the Commission on Presidential Debates Comes to the Aid of Biden

On the morning following the vice-Presidential debate, the Commission on Presidential Debates (unilaterally without any apparent participant consultation), changed the debate rules.  Trump immediately rejected those revised rules. In response, the The Commission on Presidential Debates abruptly cancelled the debate.  Commission cancels Oct. 15 presidential debate. Extremely perplexing. After all, the purpose of these debates is to give the candidates the opportunity for them to disclose to the electorate what polices they plan to implement if elected. Cancelling the debate is counter to the Commission's mandate.

I have no insider knowledge concerning this, but it is easy to speculate that this was done to secretly "protect" the Biden/Harris campaign. 

• The so-called debate "moderators", in this election cycle as in past election cycles, have proven to be anti-Republican, in this case anti-Trump. This year, it has been exposed the Commission itself is made-up of Never Trumpers even if they are supposedly Republicans. So the Commission itself is now partisan (pro-Biden) 
• Biden has evaded answering policy questions. One notable example, his repeated refusals to answer questions concerning the US Supreme Court.  At some point even the anti-Trump media may begin to ask this question and other potentially embarrassing questions. Squelching the debate may keep Biden's agenda "under wraps".
• Trump was an embarrassment at the first debate. An obvious conjecture supporting having a second debate by the Biden camp is that Trump would fail again. But given the abrupt cancellation of this debate, can one actually speculate that Trump did not fail? I have not looked into this issue, but I've seen a smattering of headlines made by biased Trump surrogates that Trump won, however implausible. Did Democratic internal polling actually disclose that that Biden did worse than perceived?
• The Pence/Harris vice-Presidential debate went very badly for the Democrats. Considering the virtually immediate "knee jerk" reaction by the Commission to changing the rules and then with equal rapidity cancelling the debate, one can hypothesize that an unknown someone saw something negative in a crystal ball and screamed: STOP!!.
• Trump, in response to the Commission's rule change, to a virtual format, offered to hold the debate outdoors. Whether this option, or other options that considered health issues were evaluated by the Commission is unknown. The point appears to remain that this debate was quickly cancelled, apparently to protect Biden.
  

Corrupt Moderators and the Media Blatantly Supporting the Democratic Party

 Last night, the vice-Presidential debate occurred. It quickly became obvious (as it did with Chris Wallace being the moderator of the Presidential debate) that the moderator, Susan Page, was a Democratic sympathizer.  She asked, if you can even call it "asking", adversarial questions of Mike Pence, the Republican vice-Presidential candidate. In asking these (fake) questions, Ms. Page was asking Pence questions which he and Trump had previously answered. It is as if Ms. Page appeared to be reading from an assumed Democratic playbook were each moderator and media must continuously ask these questions over and over again, despite the fact that they were previously answered numerous times. Seem to be a case of repeating the same lie over and over again so that the electorate will eventually accept the premise that Republicans are bad.

1. That Trump won't accept a Biden win and will attempt to remain in office.
2. That Trump won't condemn the false claims by Democrats that he supports White supremacy.
3. Charlottesville.

On point #1, Pence did a very effective response to Ms. Page where he highlighted how the Democrats abused the power of the state to spy on the Trump campaign in 2016, the Russia collusion hoax, the Mueller report, and the attempted coup of Trump through the impeachment process. It has been the Democrats who have refused to accept the results of the 2016 election.  The Democrats are now trying to disrupt the 2020 election process. Hillary Clinton even said that if Trump wins, that Biden should never concede.

Katie Pavlich, of Fox News, concerning the debate moderators, noted that one needs to also examine the controversial questions that the moderators are avoiding to ask. She noted that the moderators are not asking questions related to public controversies that would make Democrats "uncomfortable". Examples, gun control, illegal immigration, health care for illegal immigrants, eliminate Electoral College, abortion, defunding the police, and Hunter Biden. The electorate deserves answers from the Democrats to these questions so that they can make informed decisions. 

As an interesting aside on Democratic illogic, the Democrats contend that the approval of Amy Coney Barrett to the US Supreme Court be delayed to after the Presidential election to give Americans a voice in selecting the President who will make the nomination. Absurdly, the Democrats refuse to release the names of potential Supreme Court nominees or to address the issue of court packing thereby depriving Americans of the ability to know what they are voting for.

Since originally posting the video above, the following story appeared: Biden says voters don't deserve to know his stance on packing Supreme Court. Surprising that Biden would actually double down on this obfuscation and say that the electorate does "not deserve to know".

Should there be a third debate, it will be interesting to observe whether the three topics posted above don't somehow magically re-appear as fake adversarial "questions".  Will the moderators ask Biden any of the "uncomfortable" questions?  The electorate deserves to know.  It is the Democrats who are the threat to democracy.

Trump, The Presidential Debate, and the virulant anti-Trump Media

Trump's performance at the Presidential debate held on September 29, 2020 was awful. He kept interrupting and would not let Biden speak. One of the quick immediate takeaways that others made was that Trumps constant interruptions actually helped Biden, as Biden was not provided the opportunity to make his infamous gaffes. Unfortunately, that is now water-under-the-bridge to Trump's detriment.

Time makes a difference. In reading the reviews following the debate, it emerged that the this "debate" was a continuation of the incessant barrage of pejorative "questions" by the anti-Trump media. Lou Dobbs, of Fox News,  recently put together a montage of times where Wallace (the supposedly neutral moderator) started asking (four years ago) Trump about so-called White supremacy only to once again repeat that question at the debate. Trump had answered Wallace then, nevertheless Wallace went down the road of adversarial interaction demanding "clarification" from Trump. So it is quite unbelievable at the number of times Wallace had previously asked this question, yet he could not seem to "comprehend" Trump's response. Seems to be an example of Wallace playing stupid. Of course, at the time of the debate, I missed this as Trump was too busy interrupting.

Wallace also had the opportunity to insist that Biden answer the question of who he (Biden) would nominate to the Supreme Court. Biden told Wallace, in his face, that he would not answer that question. Essentially "kicking sand" into Wallace's face.  Wallace never followed-up on that.  Clearly, Wallace should have asked aggressively for "clarification".  This same issue appeared with fracking. Biden one day says the is against it the next that he is for it. Yet Wallace fails to ask for "clarification".  The purpose of these debates is to provide the voter with an opportunity to understand what the candidates for President plan to do. Biden, essentially stiffed the voters and Wallace failed to do his job, as moderator, of getting an answer from Biden.

Concerning Biden. Before the Presidential debate, Biden held several small scale interviews with reporters, where Biden only took a very very limited number of question. One such interview was absolutely appalling. It appeared as if the persons asking the questions were not real reporters but Democratic Party "operatives".  None of the "questions" asked of Biden concerned issues such as fracking and/or the Supreme Court. The (fake) questions were soft-ball opportunities for Biden to condemn Trump. Biden disclosed nothing of substance. Wallace should be censured by Fox News for this lack of journalistic integrity and outright bias against Trump.

---------------

The Wallace attack on Trump video has once again been deleted. That makes two times that the video has been subsequently "disappeared". 

Video unavailable

This video is no longer available because the YouTube account associated with this video has been terminated.

US Justice Department Opens Criminal Probe into the Origins of the Fake Russian Investigation

Justice Department's Russia origins probe now formal criminal investigation. It's about time. The real story for me is the reaction of Schiff and Nadler. Schiff, Nadler condemn elevating Durham's Russia probe into criminal investigation. Of course they will condemn this action because they were instrumental in using the fabricated Mueller investigation as the vehicle to oust Trump from the Presidency. The Mueller "investigation" was not a real neutral investigation into how the Russians might have interfered in the US political process but an outright partisan attempt find a criminal act that could be pinned on Trump. 'Very substantial evidence' Trump is 'guilty of high crimes and misdemeanors,' House Judiciary Chair says. Well that failed because it was a corrupt action and no evidence was found.

Given that the Democrats have used the "Power of the State" to attempt to undo the 2016 election, a criminal investigation is warranted. Particularly, dishonest; the Democrats claim that they want to protect the US political process from manipulation and corruption. But, they have shown shown through various actions that it is the Democrats who have attempted, through corrupt acts, to manipulate the US electoral process.

Lynching, a Purposely Misconstrued Word Twisted for Democratic Political Gain

I ran across a post today were the author lamented over President's Trump use of the word "lynching". The Democrats have been asserting with faux outrage that Trump's use of that word was a racist and depraved act. According to Dictionary.com, the word "lynch" is defined as: "to put to death, especially by hanging, by mob action and without legal authority."

What the author unfortunately missed, is that President Trump is the victim of the Democrats attempts to impeach him without proper legal authority. Consequently, Trumps verbal backlash can be considered appropriate, even if coarse. This also suggests that it is the Democrats who are being depraved racists by smearing Trump with the racist label. So it is not Trump who should be demonized, but the Democrats.

The Democrats have been running on the platform of protecting the integrity of the US political process. The Democrats by attempting to smear Trump through the Muller Report, Russian Collusion, Ukrainian quid pro quo, and a questionable impeachment process have demonstrated that the Democrats have no interest in protecting the integrity of the US political process. The appropriate way that protects the integrity of the US political process is to vote Trump out of office, not through a Kangaroo Court.  Given that, it can be seen that the smearing of Trump over the word "lynching" is simply political grandstanding and very unethical.

Flashback: Top Dems, including Biden and Nadler, called Clinton impeachment 'lynching'

At least 5 House Democrats compared Bill Clinton’s impeachment to a ‘lynching’ in 1998

The Laughable Democratic Presidential Debate

Last night the Democrats held another debate for purposes of who will be the Democratic candidate for the Presidential election in 2020. Themes being pushed by the Democrats include taking the moral high-ground and being honest. Biden has claimed that the soul of America is on-the-line. This is simply bizarre since many of the Democratic candidates have already demonstrated their unethical lying behavior. Their behavior is an outrageous  subversion of the soul of America.

Elizabeth Warren refused to answer the simple question on whether her health care proposal would raise taxes. Previously I wrote: Elizabeth Warren's Laughable Ethical Proposal. 

Kamala D. Harris wants to take down Trump's Twitter account. This implies that Harris would be willing to take away free speech rights for anyone that does not agree with her. Harris also claims that Trump is despotic, yet Harris herself proposes despotic actions that would diss the US Constitution and would ignore the US Congress. Harris has repeatable publicly smeared those she does not agree with, such as Justice Kavanaugh. Harris is lawyer, who should be abiding by high ethical standards and the law. it is quite troubling that she is proposing underhanded and dishonest actions.

Turkey. An unrecognized "winner" in the debate was Turkey. The Democrats were quick to blame Trump for the Turkish attacks on Kurds in Syria. Trump made a mistake by withdrawing US troops, but it was Turkey that initiated aggressive military action against the Kurds. Turkey also has a history of genocide against ethnic minorities. Turkey invaded Cypress in 1974. The failure of the Democratic candidates to mention Turkey shows that they have little knowledge and understanding of the Middle East.

Impeachment. The lead-off question for the debate concerned impeachment. Virtually all the Democratic participants said that the impeachment process against Trump should continue. Essentially, the Democratic candidates for President want to overturn a legitimate US election. Though not a Presidential candidate, Rep. Al Green (a Texas Democrat) made the ridiculous assertion on MSNBC:  “I’m concerned that if we don’t impeach this president, he will get re-elected … the president does not have to commit a crime to be impeached …,”.   To think, the Democrats want to accuse Russia of meddling in the US electoral process and here they are doing exactly that. It is not the job of the US House of Representatives to overturn the election of the President. That is the job of the electorate, at election time.

Julian Castro.  He did not get to say much at the debate. But what was interesting is that Castro was asked a gun control question that should have gone to Beto O'Rourke. Castro, side stepped answering. O'Rourke needs to be asked how he will take away the guns of those inner city urban areas. O'Rourke claimed that people would be willing to give-up their guns. I doubt that those in the inner city urban areas would. To change gears, Julian Castro's brother, however, released the names of Trump donors. This raises the question of whether this release was meant to intimidate Trump donors. Recall Maxine Waters demands that Democrats get in the face of Trump supporters to intimidate them. Whether Julian was involved in this vile disclosure is obviously unknown, but worth investigating since politicians are known for playing dirty politics and how to disguise those reprehensible actions.

Beto O'Rourke.  Has called for the confiscation of assault rifles as a means of reducing gun violence. Beto O'Rourke: Someone who refuses to turn in gun can expect visit from law enforcement. On the surface that may seem to be reasonable, but it ignores the daily gun violence in cities such as Chicago and Baltimore. At the debate, O'Rourke was asked how he would confiscate the guns. He lamely responded that people are lawful and would be willing to give-up their (assault) guns. Unfortunately, the follow-up question of gun violence in the inner cities went to Castro, who punted. O'Rourke, like other Democrats, speaks "big", but when asked to explain, fumbles.