When will Democrats denounce Hillary?

I've been wondering why Democrats fail to speak out against Hillary's corruption and lying. The Republicans certainly don't have a problem attacking Trump and descending into a civil-war.

Good to observe that the Washington Times finally wrote an article on this concern. When will Democrats denounce Hillary? Other newspapers, such as the Washington Post, seem to dismiss Hillary's corruption, incompetence, and lying as a nonissue.

My perspective is that the Democrats won't denounce Hillary because their mindset is stuck in the feudal ages. They owe their uncompromising fealty to the Democratic party. Supporting the party takes a precedence over everything, such as being ethical or working in benefit of the national interest. In short, the means justify the end for the Democrats. Hillary is the current Democratic feudal "Queen". As such she deserves total devotion by the Democrats no matter what her character flaws are or how great her incompetence. 

This mindless devotion approaches unbelievable psychotic behavior by Democrats. I can just imagine all Democrats, like lemmings, gladly racing to jump off a cliff to their deaths in mindless impassioned devotion to Hillary.

-----------------------

Since posting there has been some breaking news. Longtime Clinton Ally Stuns Fox News Host, Withdraws Support of Hillary on Live Television. Doug Schoen, the long time supporter of Hillary withdrew his support of Hillary.  I have heard Doug speak many times, and he seemed like one of the few rationale Democrats. He was not a rabid partisan as most Democratic pundits seem to be. I heard it in passing and I was not sure that I heard it correctly. Guess I did. Maybe be Democratic "dam" is starting to develop cracks. Shoen's withdrawal of support for Hillary may be the first "drip" of many that will eventually develop into a "flood". Only time will tell.

Hillary Clinton's US Supreme Court Will Obsolete the Rule-Of-law

Be afraid, very afraid of Hillary Clinton's possible justice appointments to the US Supreme Court. Hillary, based on her remarks, will propose to nominate justices who will not use the Constitution as the legal standard of review for making decisions. Note, in the video below, the absence any reference to the Constitution by Hillary. What she does (falsely) claim is that the Court is supposed to "stand on the side of the American" people whatever that means.  For a politician, such as Hillary, this is just disingenuous "smoke and mirrors".



The implication of Hillary's response is that she would nominate justices who would not make legal decisions based on the US Constitution. Instead, a Hillary Clinton Supreme Court would; on her subjective assertion that she desires a Court that represents "all Americans", that she will nominate justices who will simply issue decisions based on the political objectives of the Democratic party.

HTML Checkbox Acts Unexpectedly When a Form is Edited

A fun filled masochistic exercises in programing is trying to figure out why an obvious piece of code fails. I had an HTML form for editing records. The form contained a checkbox for identifying whether the record is "active" or "inactive".

Pressing the submit button sends the edited data to the server, the edited data is then re-displayed on the form. Surprisingly the changes to the checkbox were not re-displayed correctly. Leaving me to wonder why.

The PHP code for the HTML form is shown below.

echo "Active:";
    if ($active=="Yes")
        { echo ' Unchecked if not active.';
            } else {
          echo ' Check to make active.';}

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The PHP code evaluated by the server shown below.

if (!isset($_REQUEST['idavar']))
    {echo "An Error Occurred #9";
            } else {
    $active=$_REQUEST['idavar'];}

My initial belief was that the HTML form when executed would send either a "0" or a "1" to the server since a checkbox is a boolean variable. Turned out, after much experimentation, not to be the case.

Even though the checkbox is a boolean variable it does not send the results to the server in the expected manner as either a "0" or as a "1". If "false" (the checkbox when not checked and the value is the number 0), no value is sent to the server and you get an error message ("An Error Occurred #9").

After some testing the following solution was developed. The checkbox in the form now correctly displays changes after the submit button is pressed.

The revised PHP code on the server is below.

if (!isset($_REQUEST['idavar']))
    {  
        $active =0;
            } else {
        $active =1;
    }

The Reprehensible Sanctimonious Behavior of the Democrats

George Will: Trump has a point about rigged elections

Exceptionally perceptive summary by George Will concerning how the Democrats underhandedly work to "tilt" the election in their favor.

Since originally posted, I ran across Project Veritas that supposedly documents Democratic dirty tricks. Below are the links to the video.

Rigging the Election - Video I: Clinton Campaign and DNC Incite Violence at Trump Rallies.

Rigging the Election - Video II: Mass Voter Fraud

I'll leave it up to you to contemplate the truthfulness of the Project Veritas videos.

 Another relevant article has since surfaced.

Undercover video shows Democrats admitting they hire agitators for Trump events

The Washington Times writes: "Those supposedly spontaneous protesters disrupting events for Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump actually may be professionals trained by operatives working with the Democratic National Committee and the Hillary Clinton campaign.

A yearlong undercover investigation by the conservative group Project Veritas Action shows Democratic strategists discussing how they hire agitators — including union members, homeless people and the mentally ill — to incite violence by provoking Trump supporters on camera at campaign stops."

The Washington Times has issued an updated article:

Democratic heads roll after video shows agitators planted at Trump rallies

 According to the Times: "Two top Democratic strategists have exited the presidential campaign after explosive undercover videos showed them discussing voter fraud and their roles in planting paid agitators at campaign events for Republican candidate Donald Trump."

Well at this stage of the election process the resignation of any staff for bad behavior is pretty much meaningless. The damage has already been done and can't be undone by November 8, 2016, election day.

Again, any readers to this article are encouraged to do their own research on this apparent attempt to sabotage the election process by the Democratic party.

George Will: Trump has a point about rigged elections

George Will: Trump has a point about rigged elections

Exceptionally perceptive summary by George Will concerning how the Democrats underhandedly work to "tilt" the election in their favor.
-------------------------------------

Since originally posted, I ran across Project Veritas that supposedly documents Democratic dirty tricks. Below are the links to the video.

Rigging the Election - Video I: Clinton Campaign and DNC Incite Violence at Trump Rallies.

Rigging the Election - Video II: Mass Voter Fraud

I'll leave it up to you to contemplate the truthfulness of the Project Veritas videos.

 Another relevant article has since surfaced.

Undercover video shows Democrats admitting they hire agitators for Trump events

The Washington Times writes: "Those supposedly spontaneous protesters disrupting events for Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump actually may be professionals trained by operatives working with the Democratic National Committee and the Hillary Clinton campaign.

A yearlong undercover investigation by the conservative group Project Veritas Action shows Democratic strategists discussing how they hire agitators — including union members, homeless people and the mentally ill — to incite violence by provoking Trump supporters on camera at campaign stops."

The Washington Times has issued an updated article:

Democratic heads roll after video shows agitators planted at Trump rallies

 According to the Times: "Two top Democratic strategists have exited the presidential campaign after explosive undercover videos showed them discussing voter fraud and their roles in planting paid agitators at campaign events for Republican candidate Donald Trump."

Well at this stage of the election process the resignation of any staff for bad behavior is pretty much meaningless. The damage has already been done and can't be undone by November 8, 2016, election day.

Again, any readers to this post are encouraged to do their own research on this apparent attempt to sabotage the election process by the Democratic party.
 -------------------------------------

Another update (10/31/2016). Evidently a Democratic operative has been feeding Hillary questions prior to her debates. Donna Brazile out at CNN after WikiLeaks reveals she leaked more debate questions to Clinton.  Seems that Hillary's unethical behavior is slowly being unmasked to the public.