Wednesday, November 6, 2013

If You Like Your Plan You Can Keep It

Unbelievable.  I kept hearing on the TV that the White House had not changed their webpage despite all the hoopla. So I decided to look, and I discovered that the Obama Ministry of Truth had not updated the website to a revisionist mantra.  What is also interesting, in perusing the website, no mention was made concerning the health insurance cancellations.

Link to: "If you like your plan you can keep it and you don’t have to change a thing due to the health care law.".  As they say in the commercials, hurry this is a limited time offer that will soon disappear.  Amazing that this assertion is still up and available for all to inspect the lie. Seems that Obama's Ministry of Truth needs to undertake some website revisions to disappear the disingenuous promise.

I also located this U-tube video: Cornyn, Sebelius spar over "keep your plan" promise.  Cornyn asks Sebelius if the statement that: "if you like your plan you can keep it" was true. Sebelius refuses to acknowledge that people are having their health coverage canceled. Furthermore she obfuscates her response by asserting that some people are in other types of plans and that others would have the "opportunity" to enroll in better plans. So getting your health insurance plan cancelled is really an "opportunity". The knowing deceit, cover-up, and denial by the Obama administration continues.

Monday, November 4, 2013

Obama's Broken Promise

Mr. Cilliza, a Washington Post apologist for Obama, acknowledged that Obama had a broken promise moment in his opinion piece: Who had the worst week in Washington? President Obama.

The "good news" is that an Obama apologist acknowledged that Obama misspoke, a euphemism for lying.

The "bad news" is that Mr. Cillizza totally ignored the fact that the Obama administration knew millions could not keep their health insurance for at least three years and that the promise would be eventually broken. As this story of deceit unwinds, Mr. Thiessen, another Post opinion writer observed that the Obama administration is a: A dishonest presidency.  Mr. Thiessen in that article referenced the The Wall Street Journal article: "Aides Debated Obama Coverage Promise" (November 1, 2013). (Unfortunately this story is behind the WSJ pay-wall). Based on the accumulating evidence, one can't simply dismiss this broken promise as being inconsequential. It was a planned deceitful act.

Obama lied and lied again to get re-elected and to mislead the electorate concerning the undesirable effects of ACA. If Obama, the ("transparent" and "above politics") messiah knowingly lies to you and misleads you, I would have expected Mr. Cillizza to have been outraged that the messiah, despite his prostrations, would have voluntarily descended into crass partisian venal politics. Doesn't Mr. Cilliza feel betrayed by this deceit?

Updated: 11/5/2013